Censored views about the fake PCR tests and equally fake Convid virus
I had often wondered whether to start a substack and never climbed over the starting hill. But my dislike of censorship has pushed me over it.
You may have noticed that, among people who oppose the Covid fraud, more people now wonder, "Was there even a new disease? Is the PCR test valid at all? Was the alleged virus ever demonstrated to exist?" (My answers are No, No, and No.) They are good and timely questions if we don’t want to play whack-a-mole against one scamdemic after another.
Seemingly as a result of the rise in dangerous questions, defensive posts are springing on substack up faster than dandelions, all trying to ensure that people ask questions but not dangerous ones. The defenders' tone is often abusive, and their arguments not much better. From time to time, I respond in the comments.
A recent example in the defensive genre (I hesitate to say "latest example" because a new one will spring up while I am writing this post):
My comment on it, now deleted by the author, who has also banned me from commenting for 100 years:
The arguments made by the virus promoters have of late been declining in quality. This post is an example. Its argument, once the speculations, warnings, and digressions are skipped over, is:
Everything in the public sphere is deemed fake by one or another (small) group of people.
Not everything can be fake.
Therefore, PCR tests and COVID are real.
I can accept steps 1 and 2, but the leap to step 3 requires more power than I can logically muster.
Here’s what happens if I try to post:
Before I got banned, I had also responded to a comment by the Good Citizen wondering whether there's a scientific explanation for how flu cases magically disappeared until the jab rollout and then reappeared on schedule. The Good Citizen writes the excellent substack
My response (deleted by the hidden hand of eugyppius):
The scientific explanation is that it's all psychological science.
COVID is completely fake, so the sociopaths needed to conjure COVID cases out of somewhere. Their hired guns borrowed COVID cases partly from influenza (whose numbers are also mostly fake [1,2], but at least the illness, even if not the virus, exists) and also from other illnesses. But there was no real change in all-cause mortality [3,4,5].
Having created enough fear, now the sociopaths could then con people into taking or mandating the highly poisonous holy waters as protection against the fake disease. The waters' "side" effects are various, including death, and the nondeadly ones are numerous enough to allow relabeling as COVID and influenza. So, influenza can return -- just in time for getting a Convid jab in one arm and a flu jab in the other.
[1] Doshi, P. (2005). Are US flu death figures more PR than science? BMJ, 331(7529), 1412. https://sci-hub.ru/https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.331.7529.1412
[2] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2015/09/29/boggling-flu-hoax-not-for-prime-time-news/
[4] https://denisrancourt.ca/entries.php?id=107&name=2021_10_25_nature_of_the_covid_era_public_health_disaster_in_the_usa_from_all_cause_mortality_and_socio_geo_economic_and_climatic_data ("We conclude that a pandemic did not occur.")
[5] https://denisrancourt.ca/entries.php?id=9&name=2020_06_02_all_cause_mortality_during_covid_19_no_plague_and_a_likely_signature_of_mass_homicide_by_government_response (Title: "No plague and a likely signature of mass homicide by government response")
Censored comments, or at least two of them, have now come back to life.
this is very interesting to read. I think you are absolutelty right, the dangerous questions are now being asked so virus posts are popping up more and more- especially with the latest 80% death in mice paper and nonsense https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/peer-reviewed-articles-are-not-published
I was also called insane today and linked in a post out virus deniers! https://pete843.substack.com/p/virus-denial-is-a-form-of-mass-formation
I am glad you decided to write on sub stack welcome
Jo
The thing is, if you assert that the SARS-CoV-2 virus does not exist and does not cause symptoms of disease, then you also assert that the GOF NIH/Wuhan laboratory experiments are a complete red herring, that the 'spike protein' does not cause any clinical symptoms either in the vaccinated or infected (because it doesn't exist), neither does the virus or its spike evoke an inflammatory immune response etc. etc. The list goes on. In essence, you are forced to construct an entire new plausible narrative and dismiss a huge body of published clinical research - from those pushing the Covid/vaccine narrative AND those very many medical experts challenging it - with regard to the events of the last nearly three years. I do not think that any of the virus sceptics have done that to my knowledge.
But having said that, I reel against censorship of any kind and feel that if you cannot accommodate somebody's views, if you disagree with them and cannot fruitfully debate with them after having become frustrated trying to do so, then you just ignore them, which is perhaps the best policy, rather than deleting their comments.